Court of Appeals says Implied Consent Law Constitutional

2/5/16  Court of Appeals says Arizona’s DUI Implied Consent law does not unconstitutionally force a DUI arrestee to consent to chemical tests.

The defendant in the case contended that the law’s sanction, namely, loss of license for at least one year if he did not voluntarily consent to the chemical test, forced him to agree to the test.  The court said, “We recognize, of course, that the choice to submit or refuse to take a blood-alcohol test will not be an easy or pleasant one for a suspect to make.  But the criminal process often requires suspects and defendants to make difficult choices,” and the Implied Consent Law could constitutionally require an arrested person to make that choice.

http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2015/1CA-CR15-0196.pdf

If you’ve been charged with #DUI or another criminal offense, getting help from an experienced and knowledgeable lawyer is one of the best things you can do for your case.  Gordon Thompson has been a practicing criminal and #DUILawyer law since 1979, and has used his vast experience to help countless people charged with DUI and other criminal offenses get the best result.  Call Gordon Thompson now, 24/7, so he can put his many years of experience to use and help you get the best result for your DUI or criminal case.

author avatar
Gordon Thompson Attorney