Supreme Court to decide constitutionality of DUI laws

4/21/16  We are supposed to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and searches of a person, their body, and their property, without a warrant and without exigent circumstances are unconstitutional.

However, a number of states (which does not include Arizona, thankfully) have made it a criminal offense to refuse to submit to blood or breath testing. Since driving is a privilege and not a right, the civil penalty of a license suspension action is not constitutionally unreasonable, and in fact virtually every state has such civil penalties in place. But to make a person criminally liable, and conceivably go to jail, for exercising their 4th amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches is another story.

Arguments were heard yesterday in the United States Supreme Court on appeals from convictions in North Dakota and Minnesota, where the defendant was convicted of the crime of failing to submit to a chemical test.

For more on this story, see the wbez.com or startribune.com articles below:

https://www.wbez.org/shows/npr/justices-consider-whether-police-may-force-a-breath-test-without-a-warrant/05dc48d9-6ccd-4e2c-b43a-6e707c7a60f8

http://www.startribune.com/u-s-supreme-court-weighs-minnesota-s-implied-consent-law/376295001/

To hear oral argument in the North Dakota case, click the link below:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/podcaststoreage/Birchfield+v.+North+Dakota+Supreme+Court+Argument.mp3

If you’ve been charged with DUI or another criminal offense, getting help from an experienced and knowledgeable lawyer is one of the best things you can do for your case. Gordon Thompson has been practicing criminal and DUI law since 1979, and has used his vast experience to help countless people charged with DUI and other criminal offenses get the best result. Call Gordon Thompson now, 24/7, so he can put his many years of experience to use and help you get the best result for your DUI or criminal case.

author avatar
Gordon Thompson Attorney